Friday, March 31, 2017

1.2 First Distinctions Likened to Wearing Things as Resonances

One important question on discernment and proper distinction is, what characterizes each thing. Those are its qualifiers. Before we consult external sources, we learn to consult the consistency of inner feelings, those inner feelings that are coherent and consistent, and of true empathy. 

Empathy and sympathy fundamentally differ, although they're used synonymously. Sometimes their meaning is applied in ways that are difficult to distinguish. Generally, however, sympathy involved pity and personal feelings. Empathy does not. Empathy is often neutral, the ability to feel what is, including the ability to see the world through others' filters. With this meaning in mind, an empathic person is not per-say effected by another's feeling. One does not take on others' feelings to such extend that one's perception is diluted by that reality. One simply recognizes the truth of another's reality to the best of one's ability. 

A clear example may be that of a caring doctor, who empathizes with his patient, but is not effected to the extend that his patient's illness becomes his. So often, those that speak of empathy mix its meaning with pity. In other words, we often hear, "I am very empathic and sensitive," in the sense that I take on others' imbalances and let them effect me. By the aforementioned definitions, that is not true empathy. That is sympathy. Consider what "sympathizers" do when for the purposes of gain and profiteering they exchange their religion, or whatever may be the case. In its most negative sense, we call them "sympathizers" and "traders". But empathy often leads to compassion, which is why those in the healing and wellness profession strive to be empathic, not sympathetic.  

Now regardless of how the words are used, I am using empathy in the aforementioned sense. For one may use a mix of sympathy and empathy and attribute similar meanings to both. Definitions are not written in stone, they're relative and pragmatic according to how language is applied. So my purpose is not to get lost in the word itself, but to clarify that I use "empathy" as I have defined it.

Moving on, consider for a moment the likelihood of trying on new cloths, when you are in need of it. When it comes to the study of spiritual phenomena, it is no different. With unattached indifference, and without judgement, you try on the various spiritual phenomena for a moment, when and if it speaks to you. 

I've spoken often of the subject of "rogue followers", "rebels", "hippies", "the psychedelic era", and "feminist" movements. These carry particular frequencies and resonances. They've given rise to a great deal of spiritual phenomena in the new-age movement and pop-culture. I do not judge them. However, more often I'm suspicious of them. They're a cry to religious superstition and institutionalized injustice, and in that light they've sometimes helped shape new ideas. On the other hand, when we oppose, what we resist persists and gives rise to greater opposition. It's like a rebellious child, who in attempting to do the opposite of his parents' doing, makes similar mistakes or worse. 

In as much as we are surrounded by so many new founders of new religions and movements, and some make more sense than others; and in as much as they influence us all as part and parcel of the fabric of pop-culture; we must learn to discern. Most importantly, they influence the youth, our loved ones and children. One common aspect is rebellion is at their root, and it is the song of youth. We must consider this carefully and compassionately. It is foolish to pretend they do not exist, or put on blinders as though we are not influenced by them. 

There is most often a mix of light and darkness. If it were in the extreme; either of extreme light or darkness; it would be easy to distinguish. Most often, darkness guises itself with great mastery in plain site. That is its mastery, its trickery. They say, "like a thief in the night," but good thieves know how to steel in plain sight; and our thoughts and feelings, especially unexamined opinions and beliefs, often become those thieves. People suffer a great deal. Families and household, neighbors and such, all suffer. They fail to face it, and suffer more. I once read, our beloved friend and humanitarian teacher, Bruno Groening (1906-1959) once said, every household is soon becoming a hospital. And it is so. 

A heavenly vision of light showed me this: I speak to the dark, not of the dark. We must learn the simple distinctions of light and darkness, and realize what we have often tried on and what we wear, as in the example of cloths. On the inner planes, many are like a person with many cluttered and unknown layers of spirits and spiritual forces, and they do not know what they have on, or what they have period. We must learn to take the blinders off, and speak not behind its back or in secret, but in plain site, as it does. People often speak "about" and "of" things. They need to learn to speak to things, to relate truly and know themselves and others, watch and discern as is, without judgement.

I have known the founders of various spiritual movements. The deepest sorrow among them is, they do not know their teachers and inspirations well. They do not know the spirit of their founders well, because they do not know themselves. It is one of the most common errors among spiritual folk. On occasion, they've shown me that they do not like me. Then again, on occasion they've deeply thanked me and said, they've been assisted in discerning the truth and spirit of their founders.    

Some of them have had teachers and inspirations that appeared highly evolved, and they were not. We had to free them from their bondage, for some hold spiritual dominion over their subjects, and drain their life-force, somewhat like batteries. Human subjects empower and feed them. In this regard, it is often the public's mistake for empowering false leaders. However, such false leaders prove to the masses their ignorance, and serve that purpose. Otherwise, they do not realize their grave errors.

Others have had teachers that were humble simpleton humans, who were far more evolved. Society has a way of putting certain types on the pedestal. Supply meets demand. In this way, they miss the mark; the real teachers, teachings, and inspirations that surround them. Society also has a way of changing those who are in the limelight. These are subtle moves of spirit, tests and trials, too common and amongst us. So it is the responsibility of the masses to learn and discern the true and innocent simpletons who are their true inspirations. As more of this realization dawns, greater leaders will step forward.

The real shapers and movers, those truly inspired founders, have a way common to them also. One must learn to study the sources within one's self first. Then recognize their representation without. Then study the sources within and without as these mirror one another. Who are they? What are they? Especially, who are their founders, and what are their true origins? Inquire and try them in as much as you must know yourself, and their influence on you. Don't wait too long without proper inquiry and investigation, neutral and compassionate, for when you wait too long their influence reaches into all areas of life. And if you should withdraw, it may have already effected family members and generations. If you should know and appreciate them better, and kiss the ground they walked on, then that too is to your advantage. 

This message is on learning to follow the mastery within and trying on, so to speak, those things that best fit you. It's to know you are important. You matter. You have guardians that wish to guide you, and you have several at all times. Furthermore, you have assemblies. If you do not call or ask, you are left to yourself. More importantly, they appear in your aloneness, not loneliness. But loneliness too may be a good lesson of separation, to know the value of union. Alone all one, remember this. 

The previous message spoke of the dawn hours, or the sun rising and setting. It also touched on learning to note and notice the import and value of certain phenomena. This message is on learning to study what is as is, in as much detail as possible. If it is with you, around you, and recurring, then we must face it and know it. 

Someone recently said, I want to get to the bottom of it. We all say it at times. But we can not get to the bottom of things if we are unable to truly face them. For example, recently I encountered someone on the issue of boundaries and discernment. A few months prior, I encountered another similar to her. It's interesting how we attract three, four, even five of the same kind of people within a few weeks. Once I encountered three individuals with the same name, within a few days. These are clearly no coincidences.

Now, there is great evil in people who think highly of themselves. They speak of oneness, love and light, but are possessed by a variety of creatures unknown to them. If I told you, some of them could contribute to the death of your loved ones, you may be surprised but it's true. A muslim miracle man once told me, the Prophet Mohammad walked among the dead in a cemetery; and it is said, he declared that many among them were taken by the Jinn. The "Jinn" are familiar spirits of various species and kinds, from which we get the word "Demon" from the Hebrew with a similar meaning, "Familiar Spirit". Remember that what is most familiar does the most harm. 

If you do not know, study this field with the intention to know yourself. Not the field of "exorcism" as it is shown with terror in the films, but the real issue of the exorcism of a variety of familiar spirits; "spirit attachments", "possessions", "witch-craft", "sorcery", "spirit releasement" and the like. There are many wise documentaries, literature, and studies on the subject, especially as of late. An early wave of this study has begun within the fields of Holism and Consciousness, and other integrative models of health. A more spiritual look at the subject is just being recognized by modern science, and within the field of Psychology, "Spirit Releasement" is beginning to gain wider recognition. I believe, within future studies it will prove as a most significant contribution to health and medicine. You may save lives, when you learn about such subject with pure intentions. Spirits, and spiritual and creative forces, have far more influence and dominion over humans, for in essence we are not bodies, we are spiritual beings. 

The most common symptom of those who are possessed by lower entities, thoughts and feelings of various kinds, including vengeful ancestors, anger, rage and the like, is domination. It is the love of power, and not the power of love. But the Creator out of mercy has given us this playground to learn our lessons. And so to each their own. Suffice to say, pride and domination is the worse affliction of evil spirits among spiritual folk, and sadly most of them are afflicted by it. Patience and humility is its antidote and cure. One must study and know these tendencies, especially in thought and feeling, within and without. Accordingly, love and compassion may enter. 

Especially there are those who speak of equality, love and light. Many of those unfortunate ones that do so falsely, or as a mix-bag, often deeply believe in the fire of activism. They believe in getting louder and louder, taking the stage into the limelight, and saving souls. Of-course many of them mean well. As I said, in my case too, more often we're confronted by a mix of light and darkness, especially in this world. But there is that common and familiar, (remember "familiar spirits"), often subtle but in plain site; there are these qualities that qualify these forces and spirits to dwell among us as a testing ground. When we speak of equality, love and light, but judge more harshly those who are actually giving and receiving it, we must ask ourselves what are we doing? Are we not the worse judge ourselves, and are we sure the "love and light" we speak of is actually "love and light"? Could it be that we worship the false god of punishment, especially that of the critique of reason? For we could receive the good in anything. And who among us is flawless? Whereas we choose to judge. 

Once I was vehemently hated by the followers and disciples of a spiritual master, because the master let them know he was delighted and awaiting my arrival before he knew who I was. This had aroused the jealousy of the disciples of "love and light". This is very common. May the Creator have mercy on such folk, who want what others have out of jealousy, what is not theirs to have. And they'll never learn to receive the truth of love and light. In reality they're starving without it, and find themselves unworthy and out of reach. Then they attack those that have it, childishly. They do not realize that their actions only makes it harder for them to receive it. It's like homeless children who kick and push love away since they trust no one. 

If our female spiritual sisters are not careful, they fall under this power-play and struggle with the male. Males too, who have issues with females. It is the same. Male domination, or female domination, both have detrimental consequences, and most families have some or much of one or the other in their ancestry. Again, one must learn to truly discern and characterize what they have on and in them.   

See! You are seated at a table. You are making certain clear distinctions between the kinds of things that truly help save lives. Then someone says, they do not want to make those judgements. They believe in equality and so on. They believe in love and light. As you get to know them better, you learn they judge more harshly. In fact, those that vehemently oppose judging others and fight for a quasi political equality, often deceive themselves and others most by their judgements. This is why many among them become lawyers and politicians. No pun intended. When in fact you are coming from a deep place of compassion, they say you are judging. Imagine Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi, when the powers that be proclaimed they were judging them, when in fact they were speaking of true justice and equality. These kinds of things happen often, when evil reverses the meaning of good as evil. 

When people are triggered, they suddenly jump into a certain mode. They are responding to a curse, a spell as though it were, without realizing it. You are making simple distinctions and they judge you. But they're the ones possessed by those judgements, not you. You are simply stating the facts. However, this dance is a tricky one. Most important, is to know yourself well in that moment, very well.

I've said enough about trying on each thing, one at a time, especially those things that you have in and around you. We must know them well. The goal is, finding that space of compassion in which there is union. When we find that, the rest is left behind, including the mind and person if need be. With true empathy comes true compassion, and with that comes true union, that is the union of truth. When two people truly love one another, they often experience moments of union that is of truth. However, these moments are more often inspired in the love of true companions and seekers, not in the ups and downs of human definitions of love and romance. 

I am quick to leave behind anyone or anything that is not resonant with my truth. When I was younger, I was too concerned and inexperienced. I blamed myself for many things. I thought I empathized, when in fact I sympathized. I compromised my own truth out of a genuine desire to help and naiveté. Now, I realize all children must learn to focus and leave behind what is not theirs, or for them. It is as simple as that, because then better things await us. But better things can not come, when our home and space is cluttered with complacency and garbage, all these false layers we wear. 

The first greatest truth is to love the Creator; the second is, to be and become lovers of truth. These are achieved, when we practice patiently, knowing one's self, in order to know the Creator; for the truth of self is selfless. With these in heart, we may discover the truth of things as they are, and that is the prayer here. 

Wherever we go, we may ask to be shown the truth of things as they are, as necessary at this moment for me, in every detail. Pray, placing them within yourself, in that vault and treasure chest of the divine spark, the heart, before the Creator. Praying this way, I have discovered great things often. And they don't stop coming, being and becoming unveiled. 

Remember that the God of Moses said, "I am that, I am". However, the exact translation and etymology is something more akin to a variation, something like, "I am-which-is-and-is-becoming-that, I am." The Creator is a constant being and becoming. Contemplating this, the Creator is the truth of each moment, in and through every moment; The Master and Mastery, is also the truth of the moment; and these two are the same, the Creator and Master (Mastery).    

- (C) Houman Z. Emami 
Friday, March 31, 2017 (completed at 3:33PM)

Thursday, March 16, 2017

1.1 First Distinctions on Unique Times of Transparency



The first qualifier to discern, to make the beginning body of the first distinctions is, any sort of spiritual and religious experience that occurs before dawn, especially between three to five am. Also those with exceptional lucidity and transparency, but I shall get to those next. However, there are things common to both. Meanwhile, these usually occur before the sunrise is visible. They could occur as dreams and visions; in meditation, inner journeys, prayer and fasting, or in any number of ways combined. It could be by chance, as we say, a seeming accident, without any action taken or declared intention.

In my native tongue and culture, Farsi and Persian, it is known that if one has dreams at dawn, the likelihood of it being called "siddiqe" - sincere - is higher. So when you say, you had a profound dream at dawn, they reply, "May it be sincere."  

In most cultures early dawn and before dawn is the time to meditate and pray. It is said the life-force is strongest at this time, the last third of the night, sometime between three and five. Some scientists have suggested that certain radiations from the Sun are most present at such times, especially right at dawn when the Sun is rising at its very zenith. Thus, the meditator rises beforehand and awaits Dawn. I've heard of ways to measure Gamma Rays, and other such subtle energies at this time, though I have not actually seen the study myself.

Sun gazers gaze into the Sun at that time, only for seconds as it is rising. However, this practice is done with great care and proper warnings and instructions. It is a practice that goes back to the Zoroastrians and Sumerians. Most important is, not to gaze into the Sun unless you may do so at its zenith from a place where its lowest point is seen - especially for a beginner. I've met individuals who've had permanent damage to their eye from improper practice in this regard. The same is true of the Sun setting, when certain radiations are most abundant at that time.

It is important to study these kinds of dreams, visions, and experiences. Many Scientists and discoverers have done so, as recorded in their own journals and retelling. Albert Einstein, Thomas Edison[1], and Carl G. Jung are but a few. Jung especially crossed between his dreaming time and conscious waking time, when the spirit of a holy man appeared to him, crossing into his waking time, before witnesses present[2]. It is especially of great value to note those experiences that occur on these auspicious hours before Dawn, or anytime, when there's a striking reality and lucidity in such dreams and visions. Sometimes they occur in waking flashes, or at certain moments and locations; in nature with exceptional beauty, for example; or in holy and sacred grounds, like cemeteries and shrines.

Most importantly, we must open the conscious active mind upon waking to notate these experiences, as Carl G. Jung did, for we find a continuity of lucidity and transparency between the superconscious, sub-conscious, and conscious active mind; realities from beyond enter into the time space continuum, thereby thinning the veils of subtle realms and hard facts. We must take notes of one kind or another. Some keep a recording device handy. Many researchers and scientists have done this in varying capacities to be woken up, or remain awake whilst having the experience.

Still more refined and important, is when one is naturally woken up. On such occasions, I have definitely woken up by a power far beyond me. As to the details each time, I shall get into that when and if relevant. However, the times these natural waking moments occur to me often, are in noon power-naps and before dawn, when I'm struck awake in the vision dream itself, sometimes with the impact felt for days or even weeks! That's not an exaggeration, for I do like to embellish or exaggerate. Notating these and spending time with them, relaxing into them and studying one's self in these particular cases, is of paramount import. Pray with them and through them, meditate on them, write on them, and do all that is necessary to show an appreciation on your part, that the divine spark may continue to source you from these highest peaks.

Such discoveries that happen naturally, and without the force of will, are of the utmost divine origin. When the force of will and experimentation is employed, their value is often diminished, for the ego interferes. When they're clearly proven through self-knowledge and an inner knowing of the Creator, one can not ignore them. They happen naturally and effortlessly, and unpack themselves in time, as divine graces and gifts. Every cell of the body registers them without doubt, and eternally. That is the finest and most refined level of inspiration.

When the force of will and experimentation is employed, one must be careful in this regard. For example, taking notes and leaving the experience be is one thing. That is still quite natural to note something of import. However, when some go on obsessing and are imbalanced - and I have made that mistake at times - there are precautions. But you must decide if something that has happened to you requires deeper attention, and ultimately only you know. Therefore, I believe, staging a sacred and sincere experiment is one thing; and doing something out of childish curiosity is quite another; not childlike, for that would be good and innocent; but "childish" as in rash and manipulative, driven by selfish aims, as misbehaving children. 

Many spiritual types are still driven by their own self-interest and agenda. That creates a whole different outlook and reception of forces. It invites a different kind of inspiration altogether.

Many get themselves in trouble by experimenting with hypnosis, dreams, visions, and the like. In fact, many discoverers have made such mistakes, and sometimes admitted to their errors. For example, practices and practitioners of hypnosis and altered states often warn the premature use of such things by immature individuals, especially those with aims of fame and fortune. Also those that speak of other timelines, lifetimes, and such, who are not spiritually developed - many are medical practitioners with little spiritual evolution - often admitted to making such errors, sometimes at the expense of their clients. This area must be treated with care, between one's self and the Creator foremost. If it is to know thyself and the Creator, it is most safe.

I consider many among those who use altered states and hypnosis to access information as either; 1) unconscious hijackers of intelligence, somewhat like unconscious thieves; 2) immature individuals, as in those young souls in the new-age seeking attention, fame, and fortune; or 3) ill-intended individuals. Of the three, the third is obviously most dangerous, but fewer are in that category. Those of the second category are common, and many are founders of new-age movements and religions, but I shall refrain from naming them for that is not necessary.

Majority do not know what they're doing, whether they are of the first or second category. The first category are those who are a mix of things; childish, curious, attention-seeking; a mishmash regardless of what they know or do not know. In the end, they appear unconscious to me, as in they ultimately and simply do not know.

For example, I have seen religious people, who force their ideologies and prejudice by use of hypnosis and various kinds of suggestion that is not obvious at first. New-age folk do that too. If these were in olden times, we would call what they do "Black Magic", that is a manipulation of the life-force. They hook individuals in that way. Also, among indigenous tribes, there are those that utilize the deliberate use of Black Magic, and it can be potent and powerful, when they actually will to do evil magic. Many modern practitioners of the new-age, without knowing it, are afflicted by a whole range and variety of Black Magic. This is due to their immaturity and unconsciousness. It can be serious, for I have personally seen many of them end-up in psych-wards. And those that mix new-age stuff with indigenous Shamanic practices, there are many such ones, who do an injustice to their own good tribes' names. For example, many Native American and African practitioners manipulate their practices for fortune or fame, and this is a disgrace to their elders; nevertheless, they are as rebellious children.

Then again, some licensed practitioners and medical doctors, including a number of renown Mediums and Channels, utilize certain techniques with futile end-results. Some have admitted to their errors and the detrimental effects on themselves and others as they've matured. These things are not obvious at first. What happens in many such cases, is that people innocently partake of a paranormal phenomena, since it seems important at first. However, all too often, they are not fully aware of their own fears and subconscious whims and ambitions, and they ignore the original intent or calling, or they misconstrue that original experience. As a result, there are interferences and distortions, fragmentations, and sometimes such people in roles of leaderships take their audiences up and down with them. But to each their own, as likes find one another to learn similar lessons.

I do not want to mention the aforementioned groups by name, for we all know some here and there. They are more abundant that we may know, or want to know. Often they deeply influence pop-culture. For it is easier to pretend we all want to belong somewhere, and people generally do not investigate the sources of the things they profess or follow.

One clear distinction is what I call "rogue followers"; which is the majority of those who seek spirituality as empty followers; but since they do not truly receive the blessings of their teachers and elders, they are "rogue". That is their "energy signature", and I use the word loosely to mean the feeling they emote, the presence behind their actions. Most new age religions and activist movements have this element of "rogue followers", and so one who sees beyond the veil can easily recognize the spirits around them. In spirit they're followed by many desperate, empty, and un-evolved spirits, just like themselves. They could be helped and released from these spirits, if they would so repent and humble themselves before the higher celestial forces of heaven and the Creator. But those that go so far, unfortunately do not return. Many founders in the psychedelic drug movements, the hippie and feminist movements, some of whom were renowned scholars and teachers, are of this group that form many trends in pop-culture.  

My advice: Avoid extremes. Pray. Let the divine and your own creativity guide you naturally. Ask and receive, but do not force. Experiment with your own creativity, but with pure intent to know yourself and your Creator. Do not consult others generally. For such matters, first study yourself thoroughly. General information is only for cross-referencing. When it comes to spiritual information, take great care before you take counsel. However, if you find those who are truly "God-sent" then listen carefully, and do not change what they tell you. First, listen and appreciate their many years of wisdom and experience. The outcome is obvious. A person and company with purer intent draws you closer to your desired results without further due or delay. Remember, the greatest things in life are given freely, as the air you breathe, as your organs give. Remember, God is not for sale. You feel closer to your own very heart in good company. Avoid wicked company. The purer and more transparent the intent, the purer and more transparent the finding, inwardly and outwardly. If your result is harmful or not helpful, look at yourself and purify yourself and intentions. The divine is always present. You must learn to be attentive and present. Be willing, ready, and obedient to be called to attention.

The majority of us are a mix of things. The humblest approach is to be willing and ready to be humbled often. Repent often, as in forgiveness and willingness to refine and learn. We have picked up many afflictions and bad habits along the way; from pop-culture, ancestry, religions, and such. Learn to unlearn. Do to undo. Know unknowing, the heart's unknowing of the mind. Let the heart un-know the know-it-all attitude of the modern perfectionist mind.

The threshold and threshing-floor of knowing and unknowing... is where the heart is, the treasure, home.

I have ventured off a bit, but I shall pick it up in the next essay. After a time, the loose ends come together.

---
(C) Houman Z. Emami
---

References 

1. http://www.wilywalnut.com/Thomas-Edison-Power-Napping.html, accessed, Thursday, March 16, 2017

2. See Jung's Map of the Soul, by Murray Stein, in describing and developing his latter philosophy Jung refers to a holy man as his teacher. This man appeared to him from spirit, from the holy land of Israel. In the physical realm, he knocked and was welcomed, before the eyes of witnesses who verified the event. They too were at Jung's place at the time. After much dream study and reflection in the former part of his life, this event was a natural result in spirit entering the wakeful time space continuum.

- (from http://www.wilywalnut.com/Thomas-Edison-Power-Napping.html); excerpt:
"Other luminaries such as Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher, Lyndon Johnson and Ronald Reagan have shared that secret weapon. And it is called Power Napping!


"Now while you can 'get by' on 4 or 5 hours sleep a night, new research by Dr. James B. Maas, author of the book "Power Sleep", shows that's not enough for peak health. You need to compensate in other ways. As much as anything, Edison delighted in the popular image of being a heroic tireless inventor who proclaimed sleep "a heritage from our cave man days." But really he needed to nap in the day to keep his brain functioning well. It's said that he could sleep at the drop of a hat and was once discovered asleep in a cupboard!

"So Edison used power napping to catch up on much-needed rest and to give his phenomenal brain a break from conscious effort, allowing his unconscious processes to do the genius thinking for him. Let's see how that worked...
During his day, Edison would take time out by himself and relax in a chair or on a sofa. Invariably he would be working on a new invention and seeking creative solutions to the problem he was dealing with. He knew that if her could get into that "twilight state" between being awake and being asleep, he could access the pure creative genius of his subconscious mind.

"To prevent himself from crossing all the way over the "genius gap" into deep sleep, he would nap with his hand propped up on his elbow while he clutched a handful of ball-bearings. Then he would just drift off to sleep, knowing that his subconscious mind would take up the challenge of his problem and provide a solution. As soon as he went into too deep a sleep, his hand would drop and the ball-bearings would spill noisily on the floor, waking him up again. He'd then write down whatever was in his mind."

Introduction



It's been sometime since I've been inspired to write on the varieties of spiritual and religious experiences, from a more neutral and universal standpoint. By "universal" I do not mean some notion of universalism or universalizing on the whole. That is too grandiose a claim, and in my opinion somewhat arrogant. I'm rather of the practical and pragmatic approach, with certain principles at heart. Those principles may be considered general, and I mean universal in that sense.

Why I say "neutral and universal" is because, I am including certain notions of universality as it is presented in Science and Philosophy, as in "justified true belief" as a premise for an epistemology, the study of how we know grounded in sound judgement and reason; but I stress, not void of passion and feeling. In fact, if it were up to me, I would replace the word "rationale" with "empathy", so as to revolutionize - or "involutionaize" as an inner revolution - the whole notion of rational intuition. It is more akin to empathic intuition in my awareness, that is of heart intelligence.

Empathy is where reason and passion meet, and compassion is born; where the personal and impersonal meet, and intimacy of a quite different kind is born. In any case, here I am focusing on this long sought out practice and inspiration of true empathy to guide me.

Recently, especially at my fortieth birthday, but also as the year 2012 came to an end, I've become increasingly aware of completing my own works. This intuition commands, and I've now come to a place in my life, in which I have the fortune and blessing to obey. Prior to this time, I was unable to do so, for fear of many kinds. 

But that is another subject, which I may touch on here and there where necessary. In short, it took much preparation to hold my ground against the onslaught of many obvious, but more importantly subtle, kinds of judgement and persecution.


---

Back to the "Qualifiers" as ways to discern and differentiate between the varieties of religious and spiritual experiences. These distinctions simply qualify the experience and bring them to a certain light. It is important that this be done within the context of our modern philosophies and culture.

First, I do not want to make distinctions as separate and fixed cases. This is not an empirical science, and I do not intend to play in the chid-like playrooms of logic and syllogisms. As I said in the introduction, I have no interest in making what I know universal, necessary, or any such thing. In matters of spirituality we need far more humility than making such claims. That is my belief anyway. These distinctions are made with certain inherent features together and in harmony.

So certain distinctions need to be made. But let us not make the mistakes of our forefathers and founders. Even in spiritual matters, some have sought to make a science of religion and spirituality. God, spirit, and religious experiences are not things to infer as anything. God is a something that is everything and nothing, as such inferences are not possible as an empirical science within the frameworks of western empiricism and rationalism. 

Skeptics who try to debunk the Spiritualists, and Spiritualists who try to universalize the proof for the existence of God, are both mistaken in my opinion. For we can not create God in our image, rather we were created in that image, a something that is nothing, no thing and everything. 

That will be the subject of my essay on The Proof for God & the Religious Experience. So I do not intend to provide such proof or evidence, for the futility of such endeavor is obvious in both, Skeptics and Spiritualists. This is not empirical science as is commonly accepted, but perhaps an intuitive science has existed throughout history. That is of a different nature, and what many forget is, that intuitive science is the foundation of modern science.

Rational, rather rational and creative, intuition and divination laid the foundation for modern science, and came long before it. Therefore, true science as I understand it, is not the empirical science of modern west, but what was given by the likes of the great Sages and Mystics, who were the true founders of science; including the science of modern west having its roots and foundation is that science; in texts such as, The Canon of Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and The Yellow Emperor's Classic of Medicine, which are science and divination texts that laid the foundation of modern science. Modern scientists would do well to remember the founding fathers and mothers of science were divine philosophers.

All my distinctions overlap and are interrelated between these intuitions of east and west. They work together coherently, also with certain cohesion, however, they do not all have to be present. They may change as in a flux and be dynamic. Fix points and constants are momentary. On one hand, when several of these qualifiers are present, there's more credibility and import in that discovery; on the other, one discovery may debunk others.

The first distinctions I wish to make are the general marks and signs of spiritual and religious experiences that are somewhat common. In that sense, they are common, usual, general, and universal. However, they are unique to each one, and cross borders between nations, cultures, and religions. Most ancient traditions have some semblance of them. I shall begin there.

Second, as I develop these distinctions, I shall draw from those traditions that make the clearest distinctions bearing on their teachings. After some twenty four years, I believe it is my responsibility to make these points on discernment, differentiating between such matters, as in many cases this may be a matter of life and death and saving lives. If the subject had not impacted me as such personally, I would not endeavor to make such thing known.

For example, the Sufis, also known as Muslim Mystics, make many distinctions for the heart, self, and soul. These do not exist in other teachings in the same manner, especially given the particular focus on the heart as the faculty of intuition, and not the brain. Socrates and the Greeks also made similar distinctions as intuition was the faculty of the heart, however, later scientists claimed that it is rather the right hemisphere, the creative side of the brain. 

Modern science once more has returned to the heart, as we can now measure the electromagnetic wave emanating from the heart. It is known to be one hundred times electrically, and some few thousand times magnetically, the strength of the brain. For this, refer to the works of Gregg Braden (http://www.greggbraden.com/), and the HeartMath Institute (https://www.heartmath.org/). Muslim Sages, Saints, and Scholars had begun this inner revolution at the time of the Prophet Mohammad, and have continued since, by giving various mentions of the heart as repeated in the Holy Quran some two hundred times.

One of the earliest texts that appears to that extend, actually mirrors much of what is revealed in modern science, and it is in the classic Sufi book, A Treatise on the Heart, translated in English as, Three Early Sufi Texts, by al-Sulami and al-Tirmidhi. Another like it with greater clarity further expounding on the self, is given by the Master of Orientalists, Shaikhal Ishraq, Suhrawardi, founder of Illuminationist Philosophy, also translated in English as The Shape of Light. So these stand as examples to do with the heart, and varieties of self.

There again, for example, the way the Holy Spirit and the heart is introduced in the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth is very unique. It was not shown in that way before him, though it may have been generally introduced.

Now, all of the aforementioned have touched me deeply and personally, in the realms we know as miracles and the miraculous. More importantly, the wisdom inspired in such life - without which life is not worth living - is the motive itself.

The same might be said of dreams and other matters. They are given special attention in various ways and in various cultures differently, also by various scholars and discoverers. Each have impacted me in a number of ways, both within the thirteen plus years of studying Philosophy and Religion, and the years spent in Holism and Consciousness studies and my travels.

I shall draw on those that I know, with special attention to Muslim and Judeo-Christian Mystics, as these are the foremost sources of my inspirations. However in our times of post-modernism, I believe, we must use all the basic and simple knowledge available at our disposal, including those that may seem irrelevant but remain relevant. If our ancient and modern philosophers and scientists lived today - "modern" in Philosophy covers periods and generations before us - I'm certain they would have used the modern science of physics and quantum theories and technologies of the same kind, to expand their scope of understanding.

Only a rigid and prejudice researcher and scholar would limit one's self to a specific science or religious study, to the exclusion of others. Especially if these pertain directly to one's inquiry, it is paramount that they be included. For example, modern studies of The Observer Effect in quantum theory are not only relevant on that level of reality, but rather on the very physical structure of matter. Modern physicists like Dr. Amit Qoswami and Fritjof Capra address such issues at length. So, we must undo the errors of those who insist on an exclusive approach so as to retain a certain purity in each given field.

Generally speaking, there are too many rigid puritans in every field, who need to open and expand their horizons. This tendency has wounded and damaged the richness of humanity, and I believe it is time we let this tendency go. But as we know, "Old habits die hard."

There may be a certain truth in maintaining a level of purity, so as to not mix things up prematurely, as in creating a mishmash soup that sickens the person. You can not mix too many cuisines on one plate of food, and not expect to have indigestion. Give each thing its due time to appreciate it as is. Yes it is noteworthy to give each subject its due attention and respect within its own discipline; however, the study of life is not limited and exclusive to one area of science or religion, or to one religion. This error has been made all too often and created a great deal of divide between cultures and peoples, but in our time of post-modern realities all borders are crisscrossed and overlap, especially via technology and a mix of races and sciences. This must become an acceptable fact of our time, and our rigid thinkers and scholars would sooner or later have to adapt.

But I must emphasize that these distinctions are not always altogether in the same order, nor are they altogether at all a necessity. Sometimes one condition over-rides all others. And again, all conditions are transitory passages, but somewhat necessary in that stage. Taken together, there's greater transparency in them; yet one may shine with such brightness so as to blot out the rest. We shall touch on these intricacies.

---

- (C) Houman Z. Emami